On June 13 this year, the Ministry of Agriculture approved the import of three types of genetically modified soybeans. After the incident was exposed by the media, some members of the public were concerned about its potential risks and called for an open evaluation and approval process for genetically modified products. Today, the Ministry of Agriculture and the China Association for Science and Technology sponsored a large online series of interviews by the Chinese Agricultural Society and People's Daily to discuss “Generation of Genetically Modified Plants†for the interpretation of GM soybeans. Guests Dai Jingrui (Professor, National Maize Improvement Center, Professor of China Agricultural University), Li Ning (Director of Transgenic Safety Management Division, Science and Technology Development Center, Ministry of Agriculture), Jin Yijun (Associate Researcher, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Microbiological Environmental Safety Supervision and Inspection of Genetically Modified Plants of Ministry of Agriculture) The executive director of the test center (Beijing) participated in the interview.
[Moderator]: Actually, Dai also gave everyone a wake-up call. Before we agree with others on this point of view, do we have to figure out what it is all about. We must proceed from our own concept of right and wrong, rather than simply follow the public's mentality. In the final analysis, some public concern about genetic modification is due to everyone’s concerns about their own health and human health. We have just said that recently the public is more concerned about the cancer-causing theory of genetic modification. Recently, the Soybean Association of Heilongjiang Province has released an analysis report of “highly correlated genetically modified soybeans with tumorsâ€, which has led to the destruction of genetically modified soybeans. Later, the person in charge of the association said that it was just an inference and it was not conclusive. During this process, Chen Junshi, an academician and food safety expert from the Chinese Academy of Engineering, responded to this and said with certainty that the combination of the two issues is groundless. Today, Dai Daishi is here. I also want to ask Dai Jishi about this matter.
[Dai Jingrui]: I am also very concerned about this matter. The man was called Wang Xiaoyu (sound). I later specifically called and asked the relevant comrades in Heilongjiang. Let’s not say what he does, just say his point of view and talk about it. There is no scientific basis for the carcinogenicity of genetically modified soybeans because there is a French expert called Seralini who promoted the carcinogenicity of the soybean. After scientific argumentation, he believed that what he said was unfounded. A professor at Kane University in France who is also a member of Greenpeace. He has long opposed GM foods. He published an article through his experiments called "Food and Chemical Toxicology" published an article, after rats ate Carcinogenic. The European Food Safety Agency and the European Commission are very concerned about this matter. They have done an analysis to prove that its experiment is unscientific and scientifically unfounded. These results are inconsistent. Some of them have eaten too little. Cancer, eat more than not yet cancer. This matter was published last year. I am very concerned about this matter. The person who made the article criticized himself and said that I was mistaken. I will not be genetically modified. It is such a situation. Some people saw him this article, or hearsay, they heard that soybean causes cancer. This is simply not the case.
[Dai Jingrui]: The soybeans imported by our country are also subject to safety censorship. For so many years, there have been no problems. In the past 17 years, there has been no problem in any one genetically modified food in the world. There is no example that can stand the test. This is for sure, so far.
[Moderator]: Therefore, the attitude of seeking truth in science is a very rigorous one. Even if an experiment is done, the experiment has contingent results and cannot represent all correct conclusions. During this process, the public may occasionally hear such a message and feel that it is true. It is true whether this process can stand the test of time, whether it can stand the approval of all scientists, and we may also pay attention to the eventual result.
[Dai Jingrui]: Let's not believe it, let alone pass it on. There must be a basis for it. Now some people are not responsible. There was an old lady yesterday. She said that there are so many cancers now that they are eating genetically modified foods. Out. I say you give an example. Whoever eats genetically modified foods has been cancerous. A brother or a family of five people all eat the same thing. There is one person who has cancer. These people are not allowed to have cancer. What is the reason? Therefore, there is no basis.
Sorbitan Esters (Span)can be used as Emulsifier And Stabilizer in food, textile, cosmetic, and other industry. Can also be used as drug carrier and solubilizer in pharmaceutical industry, as dispersant in mineral flotation
Polysorbate(Tween), it is polyoxyethylene sorbitan oleate can be used as emulsification protein in Biology experiment, sealants In biological experiments and O/W emulsifier
Span Tween,Emulsifier And Stabilizer,Tween Polysorbate Surfactant,Tween Chemical
NINGBO LUCKY CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CO. LTD , http://www.chinaluckychem.com