Recently, netizen Mr. Liu posted a message in the forum for help, saying that he recently changed a new house, and would like to take the old floor inside the old house for resurfacing, but he is not very familiar with the cost, and does not know whether the "secondary use" is cost-effective. This topic has also attracted the attention of many netizens who are pursuing low-carbon and environmental protection.
Can you use the old floor resurfacing according to the situation?
In the pursuit of low-carbon environmental protection, the reuse of household items such as furniture, home appliances, wooden doors, etc. are well received by consumers. So, for the floor, can it be "secondary use"? In this regard, Liu Guofu, the head of Dongfang Yimu Decoration Engineering Department, said, "Not all situations are appropriate. According to the actual situation of the floor, choose There are not many owners taking away."
Manager Liu first made a relevant analysis on Mr. Liu’s question. He said that if the installation time is short, it is also easy to disassemble, you can consider taking it away. However, if the floor itself is not very good, it is not necessary to do so, because the disassembly and assembly fee is now 20 yuan / square meter, plus some companies charge the freight, door-to-door fees and other demolition losses, compared to buy The price of the new floor is not cost effective.
At the same time, we must also consider the housing area of ​​the new house. If the old floor can not meet the use of the new house, the owner should consider replenishing. However, what happens is that you can't make up the same type of floor as the original one, or the new and old floor will have a height difference. Manager Liu reminded the owners that it is best to consider the housing area before disassembly and assembly. It is best not to have replenishment.
Old house can be more cost-effective to use solid wood flooring
Although there are not many owners who choose to take the floor away, this does not mean that the floor is completely "secondary". Manager Liu said that if the old house was renovated, there were still a lot of owners who did not dismantle the floor, especially the original installation of solid wood flooring. On the one hand, it can save costs, on the other hand, the used solid wood floor formaldehyde is basically dissipated, and it is more environmentally friendly.
"It is also necessary to look at the actual situation of the floor, especially if there is no insects. If it is a good solid wood floor that is retained, if it is determined not to be removed, the floor should be protected during the construction process. After completing other projects, the floor should be Polishing can basically achieve a completely new effect. However, if it is a composite floor, the owner is not recommended to keep it in the case that the wear layer has been worn away."
In addition, for the current construction requirements of the owner's floor, Manager Liu also introduced the relevant instructions. “There are fewer owners who need to take the floor away, but there are still more to keep the floor when the old house is renovated, reaching 50%. From the perspective of doing so, it can really save renovation costs, and in a big way, it also contributes to low-carbon environmental protection."
Not optimistic about the floor "trade-in" economic benefits are weak
Speaking of "secondary use", I have to mention the very hot "old-for-new" topic. Xiaobian telephone asked the veteran of the industry - Xu Yalin, the supervisor of Fangzheng's inspection project, saying that "the old-for-new is to look at the industry, floor recycling." Going back does not produce too much economic benefit, it is a gimmick of corporate speculation, and it is also a disguised discount."
Prefab Workers Camp,Portable Camp House,Prefab Camp Building,Prefab House,Modular House
Prefab House Co., Ltd. , http://www.china-steelframe.com